Categories
Conflict

Ochirac!

The difference between a “coalition of the willing” and U.N.-authorized force is nothing less than the credibility of international law.

Categories
Conflict Culture

‘Europeans are from Venus…’

“The emotional leitmotifs of anti-Americanism are resentment mingled with envy; those of anti-Europeanism are irritation mixed with contempt.”

Categories
Conflict Liberalism

Decisions.

President Bush’s case for war is different than the one that “reluctant hawks” like the liberals listed here have endorsed.

Categories
Conflict Politics

Dissent from the center.

Liberals should describe how right-wing policies threaten things that most Americans value, and they should do so in a way that doesn’t borrow an ounce of rhetoric from the radical left.

Categories
Conflict

Marching as to war.

Bush’s administration says time is running out for Saddam Hussein, but he hasn’t convinced most people that all the hurry is justified.

Categories
Conflict

Regime change: past successes and failures.

Getting rid of Saddam Hussein would be the most ambitious regime change the U.S. has tried to force by far.

Categories
Conflict Interfaith Relations

The varieties of religious war.

Asking religious questions is the genuinely spiritual — and democratically necessary — task. Insisting on answers, however, is profoundly dangerous.

Categories
Conflict

About those weapons…

Without evidence of weapons of mass destruction — especially nuclear weapons — what does Bush’s public case rest on?

Categories
Conflict

Wrong ANSWER.

It is deeply counterproductive for liberal or religious groups to endorse (even implicitly) the agenda of a group like ANSWER.

Categories
Conflict Totalitarianism

Buehrens direct.

I share Buehrens’s opposition to the Bush administration’s stated policy of pre-emptive war. But finding things to admire about Saddam’s regime hurts his pragmatic argument.